Skip to content

How it works

Why claims are rejected

The disqualifiers actually printed in the documents, not the ones a vendor mentions.

Every reason below is printed in a document, not assumed from how subsidies usually work. Most are settled rules, and several of them are new. One is a genuine open question this atlas will not pretend to resolve.

Anything built before NHB’s clearance

This is the one most likely to catch a grower who is doing everything else right, because it rejects the application outright rather than reducing it, and because the approval that matters is not the one most applicants have in mind. The In-Principle Approval is no longer mandatory. The Grant of Clearance is, and nothing may be built before it.

National Horticulture Board Operational Guidelines JANUARY 2025 (NHB Operational Guidelines, January 2025: nothing may be built before clearance)

National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India (Plot No. 85, Sector-18, Institutional Area, Gurugram 122015)

Printed January 2025

Chapter 04, "Implementation of the project", item 4 (PDF p.52), verbatim: "Commencement of any project works at site before GOC is not permitted and shall lead to rejection of the application." The same chapter states it twice more: "Disbursement of Term Loan and implementation…Read the full clause
Chapter 04, "Implementation of the project", item 4 (PDF p.52), verbatim: "Commencement of any project works at site before GOC is not permitted and shall lead to rejection of the application." The same chapter states it twice more: "Disbursement of Term Loan and implementation of project is not permitted before issuance of Grant of Clearance to the project by NHB. Any disbursement of term loan before issuance of GoC will lead to rejection of proposal by NHB." (PDF p.50), and, in the Important Instructions, "Obtaining of Grant of Clearance (GoC) is must for starting the project work." The clause then names the preliminary works that ARE allowed first, out of the applicant's own margin money: land levelling and digging of pits, compound wall or fencing with gate, tube well or borewell as part of the project, root stock plantation with drip in the case of grape plantations, application for power, internal roads and drainage, and other statutory approvals. Note separately that the In-Principle Approval cum Letter of Comfort is no longer compulsory: "Unlike previous guidelines, the issuance of IPA cum LoC is not mandatory." It is the GoC, not the IPA, that gates construction.

PDF p.52 (Implementation, item 4); PDF p.50; PDF p.49 (IPA no longer mandatory)

Read on 14 September 2026 by chirag.

The same question under MIDH is still open

MIDH contains no clause tying prior sanction to the start of construction, and we searched for one twice. But MIDH’s own text defers the approval procedure for this category of project to a separate document this corpus does not hold, so its silence may mean the rule sits somewhere we have not read rather than that no rule exists. If you are going the MIDH route, ask your state horticulture department before you break ground rather than relying on that silence.

A family member who already claimed

Since 21 August 2026 only one member of a family may avail assistance under any NHB scheme or component, and family means your spouse, father, mother, sons and daughters. The bar applies “irrespective of any unutilised portion of the maximum admissible ceiling”, so a small grant drawn by a relative years ago can, on the face of this rule, have spent the family’s entitlement. Misstating it is not a neutral mistake either: the circular makes suppression or misrepresentation grounds for recovery of the assistance with interest.

PUBLIC CIRCULAR No.NHB/CC/Guidelines/2026-27 (NHB Public Circular, 21 August 2026: the revised family definition)

National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India; signed C.P. Gandhi, Joint Director (Coordination)

Printed 21 August 2026

Item 1, "Revised Definition of Family and Eligibility", verbatim: "For the purpose of determining eligibility under NHB Schemes, the term “family” shall comprise the applicant's spouse, father, mother, sons and daughters." Its bullets, verbatim: "Only one member of a family…Read the full clause
Item 1, "Revised Definition of Family and Eligibility", verbatim: "For the purpose of determining eligibility under NHB Schemes, the term “family” shall comprise the applicant's spouse, father, mother, sons and daughters." Its bullets, verbatim: "Only one member of a family shall be eligible to avail financial assistance under NHB Schemes, whether individually or through HUF, partnership/proprietorship firm or as a Director of a Company, subject to the applicable provisions."; "Once financial assistance has been availed by any member of an applicant’s family under any NHB Scheme/component, no further financial assistance shall be admissible to any other member of the same family under any NHB Scheme/component, irrespective of any unutilised portion of the maximum admissible ceiling."; "The restriction shall apply across all NHB Schemes/components and shall constitute the final entitlement of the family."; "Where financial assistance has already been availed by an FPO/FPC/Company, its members shall be eligible to avail assistance once in their individual capacity, subject to the revised definition of family."; "Suppression, misrepresentation or furnishing of incorrect information for obtaining financial assistance shall render the applicant liable for recovery of the assistance released along with applicable interest." This REPLACES the narrower definition still printed in the January 2025 guideline itself, whose Chapter 01 reads "The term family shall refer to the husband, wife, and dependent minor children" and allows that "any or all members are eligible to avail benefits under the scheme". Under the circular only one member may.

Page 1 of 4, item 1 (and, for the definition it replaces, guideline PDF p.14)

Read on 14 September 2026 by chirag.

Being in a category that may not apply at all

The same circular bars several categories outright, and two of them catch people who would never expect it: a retired pensioner drawing ₹10,000 a month or more, and a “Group of Farmers”, which closes a route a good many growers were pointed at. Family members of anyone in these categories may still avail one-time assistance, subject to the family rule above.

PUBLIC CIRCULAR No.NHB/CC/Guidelines/2026-27 (NHB Public Circular, 21 August 2026: who may not apply at all)

National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India; signed C.P. Gandhi, Joint Director (Coordination)

Printed 21 August 2026

Item 2, "Categories Not Eligible for NHB Assistance", verbatim: "The following categories shall not be eligible for financial assistance under NHB Schemes: 1. Present holders of Constitutional Posts; 2. Present Ministers, Ministers of State, Members of Lok Sabha/Rajya Sabha,…Read the full clause
Item 2, "Categories Not Eligible for NHB Assistance", verbatim: "The following categories shall not be eligible for financial assistance under NHB Schemes: 1. Present holders of Constitutional Posts; 2. Present Ministers, Ministers of State, Members of Lok Sabha/Rajya Sabha, Members of State Legislative Assemblies/Councils, Mayors of Municipal Corporations and Chairpersons of District Panchayats; 3. Serving employees of Central/State Government Ministries/Departments, PSUs, Autonomous Bodies and Local Bodies, except MTS/Class-IV/Group-D employees; 4. Superannuated/retired pensioners receiving monthly pension of ₹10,000/- or more, excluding MTS/Class-IV/Group-D employees; and 5. Group of Farmers." It then provides, verbatim: "Family members of persons falling in the above categories may, however, avail one-time assistance, subject to the applicable provisions of the revised definition of family." The bar on a "Group of Farmers" is reflected in NHB's own reissued eligible-organisations list, which drops "Association/Group of Growers" from the list the January 2025 guideline prints.

Page 2 of 4, item 2

Read on 14 September 2026 by chirag.

Double funding, and having applied elsewhere

This atlas recorded the MIDH and NHB question as unconfirmed until 14 September 2026. NHB now answers it: the two are mutually exclusive and assistance may be claimed under only one scheme for a single project. It is a project-level bar, so splitting components between the two schemes does not get round it, and NHB requires a declaration, counter-signed by a District In-charge, that you have not applied under NHM, MIDH or RKVY for this category of project or any of its components.

National Horticulture Board Operational Guidelines JANUARY 2025 (NHB Operational Guidelines, January 2025: the non-availment declaration)

National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India (Plot No. 85, Sector-18, Institutional Area, Gurugram 122015)

Printed January 2025

Chapter 01, "Pattern of Assistance" (PDF p.15), verbatim: "The schemes of NHB and other schemes under the Mission for Integrated Development of Horticulture (MIDH), including the National Horticulture Mission (NHM), are mutually exclusive, and financial assistance can be claimed…Read the full clause
Chapter 01, "Pattern of Assistance" (PDF p.15), verbatim: "The schemes of NHB and other schemes under the Mission for Integrated Development of Horticulture (MIDH), including the National Horticulture Mission (NHM), are mutually exclusive, and financial assistance can be claimed under only one scheme for a single project. Components that are already covered under other sub-schemes of MIDH or central government schemes such as those implemented by APEDA, the Ministry of Food Processing Industries (MoFPI), or the National Medicinal Plants Board (NMPB) shall not be eligible for assistance under NHB schemes." The same rule is printed a second time, in Chapter 04 under "Eligible Applicants" (PDF p.46), verbatim: "The Scheme of NHB and other schemes of MIDH including NHM will be mutually exclusive, and benefit can be claimed only from one scheme for one project." Annexure-II (PDF p.72), the declaration every applicant signs, names one more scheme outright, verbatim: "It is also certified that the said promoter has not applied for subsidy under the schemes of NHM (MIDH)/RKVY and any others centrally sponsored schemes either in his /her own name individually /partner/directors’ /CEO /MD or through legal entity or in any firm or Constitution, in the above category of project or its any components, or any similar project location or any other project location." The same sentence is issued separately as a form headed "Certificate about the Non-Availment of subsidy under NHM (MIDH) /RKVY and others centrally sponsored schemes", signed not by the applicant but by the District In-charge of the state horticulture or agriculture department, and listed among the papers a bank encloses with the subsidy claim.

PDF p.15 (Chapter 01); PDF p.46 (Chapter 04); PDF p.72 (Annexure-II)

Read on 14 September 2026 by chirag.

PMKSY’s expansion bar

Mushroom sits outside PMKSY’s scope entirely, so this bar never reaches a mushroom applicant today. It is worth knowing anyway, because it is exactly the kind of clause a vendor selling “cold chain subsidy” against an existing facility will not mention, and it shows the family of guidelines these schemes belong to is willing to write a hard bar when it means one.

Pradhan Mantri Kisan Sampada Yojana "Scheme for Integrated Cold Chain & Value Addition Infrastructure" (PMKSY Integrated Cold Chain & Value Addition Infrastructure (2025 revision))

Ministry of Food Processing Industries, Government of India

Printed 22 May 2025

Section 6, item (g), verbatim: "Expansion/ upgradation of existing facility(ies) is not eligible under this Scheme."

Section 6, item (g)

Read on 11 September 2026 by chirag.

Capacity floors, at both ends of the farm

NHB’s cold-storage scheme only opens at 5,001 MT of capacity, 1,000 MT in the North East. A mushroom farm’s own cold room typically runs to a few tens of MT. That gap, not the percentage rate, is what breaks a “cold storage subsidy” claim for a mushroom project’s own storage room.

The growing rooms have a floor of their own now, and it is the one more growers will hit. NHB’s integrated mushroom unit is funded only above 50 tonnes of installed capacity a year. Below that this item pays nothing at all, whatever the farm cost to build, and the clause says “above”, so 50 exactly does not clear it. MIDH sets no minimum capacity for a mushroom production unit, which makes it the door for a smaller grower.

National Horticulture Board Operational Guidelines JANUARY 2025 (NHB Operational Guidelines, January 2025: the cold storage scheme (Scheme No. 2))

National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India (Plot No. 85, Sector-18, Institutional Area, Gurugram 122015)

Printed January 2025

Chapter 03, "Scheme-02 - Scheme for Capital Investment Subsidy Scheme for Construction/ Expansion/ Modernization of Cold Storages", "Capacity and Pattern of Assistance", verbatim: "The NHB will support projects with capacities ranging from 5001 MT to 20,000 MT per project based…Read the full clause
Chapter 03, "Scheme-02 - Scheme for Capital Investment Subsidy Scheme for Construction/ Expansion/ Modernization of Cold Storages", "Capacity and Pattern of Assistance", verbatim: "The NHB will support projects with capacities ranging from 5001 MT to 20,000 MT per project based on prescribed cost norms. For North-eastern states, projects with a capacity of 1000 MT or more are also eligible for assistance." That floor is the reason this scheme is no route for a mushroom farm's own cold room, which is smaller by three orders of magnitude. The same section states the rates, verbatim: "a. 35% subsidy for projects in General Areas. b. 50% subsidy for projects in North Eastern (NE) and Himalayan States, Scheduled Areas, Vibrant Villages, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, and Lakshadweep Islands." The enhanced rate there was cut to 45% by NHB's Public Circular of 21 August 2026, cited separately.

Chapter 03, Capacity and Pattern of Assistance (PDF p.28)

Read on 14 September 2026 by chirag.

Credit linkage, missed on a project just over the line

MIDH’s credit-linkage escape covers projects up to ₹30 lakh, and named institutions at any size. A project sized just above that threshold, funded without a term loan, is rejected on this basis alone. See “Credit linked” for the full picture, including the escapes most applicants do not know about.

OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES MISSION FOR INTEGRATED DEVELOPMET OF HORTICULTURE (MIDH Operational Guidelines 2025)

Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India (published on nhb.gov.in)

Printed 31 December 2024

Annexure V, closing Note (PDF p.75), items (1) and (2), verbatim: "1) The release of subsidy need not be credit linked for the institutions like Public Sector Units, Panchayats, Cooperatives, Registered Societies / Trusts and Public limited Companies, provided they can meet the…Read the full clause
Annexure V, closing Note (PDF p.75), items (1) and (2), verbatim: "1) The release of subsidy need not be credit linked for the institutions like Public Sector Units, Panchayats, Cooperatives, Registered Societies / Trusts and Public limited Companies, provided they can meet the remaining share of the project cost, out of their own resources. ... 2) Credit linkage for projects upto Rs. 30 lakhs may be optional and subsidy would be released in two instalments in TRA/Escrow/SRF accounts based on progress after the Joint inspection report when found satisfactory." Item (2) is not annexure-scoped: it is repeated verbatim at Section 10 "NEW PROVISIONS", item (ii) (PDF p.29), in the document's main body.

PDF p.75 (Annexure V closing Note); PDF p.29 (Section 10, item (ii))

Read on 11 September 2026 by chirag.

A project finished too late, or a claim filed too late

NHB runs two clocks and both are hard. The project must be completed within 18 months of the first loan instalment, extendable by six months on justified delay and not one day beyond that; miss it and the subsidy is simply not available. Then the bank has three months from completion to file the claim. A project that runs slow, or a bank that is slow to file, loses the claim to the calendar rather than to any question about the project itself.

National Horticulture Board Operational Guidelines JANUARY 2025 (NHB Operational Guidelines, January 2025)

National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India (Plot No. 85, Sector-18, Institutional Area, Gurugram 122015)

Printed January 2025

Chapter 04, "Important Instructions", items 10 and 11, verbatim: "After successful completion of the project, the lending Bank shall submit ‘Subsidy Claim’ within 3 months of completion of the project." and "The time limit for completion of the project would be a maximum of 18…Read the full clause
Chapter 04, "Important Instructions", items 10 and 11, verbatim: "After successful completion of the project, the lending Bank shall submit ‘Subsidy Claim’ within 3 months of completion of the project." and "The time limit for completion of the project would be a maximum of 18 months from the date of disbursement of the 1st installment of the term loan. This time limit can be extended by a further period up to 6 months, if reasons for delay are considered justified by the Bank concerned and agreed to by NHB." The consequence is stated plainly: "If the project is not completed within stipulated period including extension if any, the benefit of subsidy shall not be available", and "Extensions beyond this period shall not be permitted under any circumstances." Separately, the money is locked once released: adjustment against the term loan "shall be made only as a part of the recovery of last instalment which should not be prior to 36 months period from the date of release of Term Loan."

Chapter 04, Important Instructions 10-11 (PDF p.50); Implementation 1-2 (PDF p.52)

Read on 14 September 2026 by chirag.

Funds run out before eligibility does

Every reason above is a disqualifier printed in a document. This one is different: no document needs to state it, because it is how a budgeted, committee-sanctioned scheme works everywhere, not a special rule any single scheme carries. Meeting every documented condition on this site gets you a claim worth pursuing. It does not get you a place at the front of a queue for money that runs out.

“योजना का लाभ पहले आओ पहले पाओ के आधार पर दिया जाएगा।”

Bihar Mushroom Kit & Hut Scheme states this outright: the benefit is given on a first come, first served basis. No document behind this atlas states the opposite for any other scheme, and none states an unlimited budget either.

राज्य योजना के तहत मशरुम अवयवों (मशरूम किट एवं मशरूम हट) की योजना (2025-26) हेतु ऑनलाईन आवेदन फॉर्म (Bihar state scheme for mushroom inputs (mushroom kit and mushroom hut), 2025-26, online application form)

Directorate of Horticulture, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar (उद्यान निदेशालय, कृषि विभाग, बिहार)

No date is printed on this document.

The page's own "योजना से सम्बंधित मुख्य बातें" (key points about the scheme) list, four bulleted components (paddy/oyster kit, button kit, bucket kit, mushroom hut) plus the first-come-first-served and 30%-women-priority lines, the entire substantive content of the page, above…Read the full clause
The page's own "योजना से सम्बंधित मुख्य बातें" (key points about the scheme) list, four bulleted components (paddy/oyster kit, button kit, bucket kit, mushroom hut) plus the first-come-first-served and 30%-women-priority lines, the entire substantive content of the page, above the application form fields themselves.

Read on 12 September 2026 by chirag.