RJ NHM Guideline (Mushroom)

Table row, verbatim: "मशरूम उत्पादन इकाई | 20.00 लाख रूपये | परियोजना लागत का 40 प्रतिशत अधिकतम 8.00 लाख रूपये प्रति इकाई क्रेडिट लिंक बैक एंडिड अनुदान।", 40% of project cost, capped at ₹8.00 lakh per unit, as credit-linked back-ended subsidy, against an estimated cost (अनुमानित लागत) of ₹20 lakh. 40% of ₹20 lakh is exactly ₹8 lakh, so the printed ceiling is the arithmetic result of the norm and rate, not a separate, tighter cap. On the gap against the current central norm: this is not a lower rate the state set for itself, it is the central norm the current one replaced. The Ministry of Agriculture's own earlier MIDH Operational Guidelines, dated February 2014 on its title page, prices exactly these three components at exactly these figures at Annexure-V, item "III. Mushrooms", and Government of India Annual Action Plans for states well outside this set (Punjab 2021-22 among them) reproduce them under the heading "Maximum permissible cost". Two things that does NOT mean. This atlas holds the two central guidelines and not the revisions between them, so it cannot say when the norm was raised; and a page written while that was the central norm was correct when it was written, so nothing here says this department erred. See "The Rs 20 lakh figure is the old central one" under How it works, which shows the earlier guideline in full.

Table row, verbatim: "स्पॉन बनाने की इकाई | 15.00 लाख रूपये | परियोजना लागत का 40 प्रतिशत अधिकतम 6.00 लाख रूपये प्रति इकाई क्रेडिट लिंक बैक एंडिड अनुदान।", 40% of a ₹15 lakh estimated cost, capped at ₹6.00 lakh per unit. On the gap against the current central norm: this is not a lower rate the state set for itself, it is the central norm the current one replaced. The Ministry of Agriculture's own earlier MIDH Operational Guidelines, dated February 2014 on its title page, prices exactly these three components at exactly these figures at Annexure-V, item "III. Mushrooms", and Government of India Annual Action Plans for states well outside this set (Punjab 2021-22 among them) reproduce them under the heading "Maximum permissible cost". Two things that does NOT mean. This atlas holds the two central guidelines and not the revisions between them, so it cannot say when the norm was raised; and a page written while that was the central norm was correct when it was written, so nothing here says this department erred. See "The Rs 20 lakh figure is the old central one" under How it works, which shows the earlier guideline in full.

Table row, verbatim: "कम्पोस्ट इकाई | 20.00 लाख रूपये | परियोजना लागत का 40 प्रतिशत अधिकतम 8.00 लाख रूपये प्रति इकाई क्रेडिट लिंक बैक एंडिड अनुदान।", 40% of a ₹20 lakh estimated cost, capped at ₹8.00 lakh per unit. On the gap against the current central norm: this is not a lower rate the state set for itself, it is the central norm the current one replaced. The Ministry of Agriculture's own earlier MIDH Operational Guidelines, dated February 2014 on its title page, prices exactly these three components at exactly these figures at Annexure-V, item "III. Mushrooms", and Government of India Annual Action Plans for states well outside this set (Punjab 2021-22 among them) reproduce them under the heading "Maximum permissible cost". Two things that does NOT mean. This atlas holds the two central guidelines and not the revisions between them, so it cannot say when the norm was raised; and a page written while that was the central norm was correct when it was written, so nothing here says this department erred. See "The Rs 20 lakh figure is the old central one" under How it works, which shows the earlier guideline in full.