UP NHM/MIDH Mushroom (2015-16, archived)

Table row, verbatim: Unit "No.", Max. permissible Cost "20.00 lac/Unit", Pattern of Assistance "40% of cost for meeting the expenditure on infrastructure as credit linked back ended subsidy", NHM Share "40" / Max.Limit "800000", 40% of ₹20 lakh is exactly ₹8 lakh, so the printed Max.Limit is the arithmetic result of the cost norm and rate, not an independent, tighter ceiling. On the gap against the current central norm: this is not a lower rate the state set for itself, it is the central norm the current one replaced. The Ministry of Agriculture's own earlier MIDH Operational Guidelines, dated February 2014 on its title page, prices exactly these three components at exactly these figures at Annexure-V, item "III. Mushrooms", and Government of India Annual Action Plans for states well outside this set (Punjab 2021-22 among them) reproduce them under the heading "Maximum permissible cost". Two things that does NOT mean. This atlas holds the two central guidelines and not the revisions between them, so it cannot say when the norm was raised; and a page written while that was the central norm was correct when it was written, so nothing here says this department erred. See "The Rs 20 lakh figure is the old central one" under How it works, which shows the earlier guideline in full.

Table row, verbatim: Unit "No.", Max. permissible Cost "15 lac/ unit", Pattern of Assistance "40% of cost for meeting the expenditure on infrastructure as credit linked back ended subsidy", NHM Share "40" / Max.Limit "600000", 40% of ₹15 lakh is exactly ₹6 lakh. On the gap against the current central norm: this is not a lower rate the state set for itself, it is the central norm the current one replaced. The Ministry of Agriculture's own earlier MIDH Operational Guidelines, dated February 2014 on its title page, prices exactly these three components at exactly these figures at Annexure-V, item "III. Mushrooms", and Government of India Annual Action Plans for states well outside this set (Punjab 2021-22 among them) reproduce them under the heading "Maximum permissible cost". Two things that does NOT mean. This atlas holds the two central guidelines and not the revisions between them, so it cannot say when the norm was raised; and a page written while that was the central norm was correct when it was written, so nothing here says this department erred. See "The Rs 20 lakh figure is the old central one" under How it works, which shows the earlier guideline in full.

Table row, verbatim: Unit "No.", Max. permissible Cost "20 lac/ unit", Pattern of Assistance "40% of cost for meeting the expenditure on infrastructure as credit linked back ended subsidy", NHM Share "40" / Max.Limit "800000", 40% of ₹20 lakh is exactly ₹8 lakh. On the gap against the current central norm: this is not a lower rate the state set for itself, it is the central norm the current one replaced. The Ministry of Agriculture's own earlier MIDH Operational Guidelines, dated February 2014 on its title page, prices exactly these three components at exactly these figures at Annexure-V, item "III. Mushrooms", and Government of India Annual Action Plans for states well outside this set (Punjab 2021-22 among them) reproduce them under the heading "Maximum permissible cost". Two things that does NOT mean. This atlas holds the two central guidelines and not the revisions between them, so it cannot say when the norm was raised; and a page written while that was the central norm was correct when it was written, so nothing here says this department erred. See "The Rs 20 lakh figure is the old central one" under How it works, which shows the earlier guideline in full.